%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R ] /Count 1 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 12 0 R /GS2 13 0 R /GS3 14 0 R /GS4 15 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 595.280 841.890] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20261104105044+00'00') /ModDate (D:20261104105044+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 595.280 841.890] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1913 >> stream xXێF}]`BNj_qbv'3%ΐlE@~?/SMf쾈3-vשSua]$siIIzPU^ҭ6>IՒk]t#_&AG )E|lzY[Ͼ<(f ke[ɊDKFtz"`Edehz-R~t>4iʃf+QXè$b?`Zt}Nf^Me\xlu#{C+ܹ(h ?;+nd@od+FU5/+D5ATd&L=DA4t ܝqeHفZx*"}bqrp{ @p:Ij{ZZ˽xT|&0XE>&+8?(Zc%g.|2,4>y> :2*{Ь9e!*fv lzm Yc"^l!2`ݮ26E%呏,BZAqaj x߼mP h{&ZsI?Ur)Ǵ* 2])a \=@1֪><($1T;`J 2A8%s e҉ުP|7fPEL͒K>@(Z&5GrLw t vz},He5pSoVek GWxF26"0OABĭG{fR0ϫŽz< E.hG_ HzWbysF(WW5si`7\Hs!+\hb-k-R] ât)xfna&?1sH:;ظjvE0OaZh~ц uI;kH Ƶ؊IY%qB#f Ǿ1D|3y7;5:pOn_&Ũ;8?V78,>X(aGpϗ% ";8,eIQ|סy7'_|C']ӹ!TΊZ.2U٤Zs mZz[ q Ghl=ƍ^,|;_d:-")W]'|S #ucTHt0KG#ޫԭ8Rr dQۗ%A|D]p/DATzܯvJr5oʂ<}򋁤^|]D;Ϙ󮢌.fU BMYq_AVcN 0/p#F;VZZ䕚<|맒ta 9ᙗ?~+}}{L97UsE_.p.I?rEsʧ1Ԃ"e@sٙ6DE:cg;+\><CWaF ;CǽءS endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 16 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj xref 0 17 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000372 00000 n 0000000401 00000 n 0000000550 00000 n 0000000653 00000 n 0000002639 00000 n 0000002748 00000 n 0000002856 00000 n 0000002964 00000 n 0000003077 00000 n 0000003134 00000 n 0000003191 00000 n 0000003250 00000 n 0000003309 00000 n trailer << /Size 17 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<7da32d19c3b41dce448c8d29018f8e03><7da32d19c3b41dce448c8d29018f8e03>] >> startxref 3338 %%EOF Are Most People Good? – Journals of Doc Surge

Are Most People Good?

May 03, 2010 by in Spirit Speculations

I attended an ethical workshop recently and the presenter stated she thought that most people are good. This worldview allowed her to approach people she met in a warm and open fashion which made for a rewarding and pleasant work experience. Benefits aside of such a worldview, is she right? Are most people good?

I never asked her, but I am sure the presenter thought that all of the evil acts of the world are committed by a small number of bad or misunderstood people. She saw people themselves being valued as good or bad. For her, the world is made up mostly of good people whose lives get ruined by a small number of bad people. The value is placed on the person, not on the behavior.

My experience tells me otherwise. Instead of seeing human nature being inherently good or bad, I would instead that it being imbued with potential for both. Across time and place people have struggled to avoid suffering and find happiness in life. It is the limitless ways of finding happiness that makes human nature appear so complex. Yet this complexity does not mean that we have to leave our ability to judge at the door. The value judgment of whether a particular pursuit of happiness is good or bad can be judged by the actions undertaken. The continuum between good and bad would be based around how one pursues happiness. “Good” behavior would be demonstrated when one enjoys putting the needs of others before their own needs and/or taking happiness in another’s happiness, while “Bad” behavior would see a person putting their own needs before others or having to harm/kill others to be happy.

By becoming aware of the distinction between these different kinds of happiness we can stop labeling the person or our human nature as inherently bad or good. We will find that there is no original sin or inherent angelic quality in us, just dynamic potentialities. We can then judge the actions and not the person. Awareness of this subtle but critical distinction will lead us to a healthier place as captured by Ropbert Pop in his quote: “Awareness is the first step towards healing”.

With awareness we can leave the fairy-tale worldview that human nature is inherently good and toward a more complete view of ourselves.

About The Author:

Chris Billows is a knowledge seeker who believes in social responsibility, a health care professional, and a business dabbler. The Journals of Doc Surge is his personal blog. Doc Surge (a cool synonym for Billows) is inspired by Doc Brass from the Planetary Comic series who in turn was inspired by the 1930s pulp hero Doc Savage.

Leave a Comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Categories
204-430-9956
© Chris Billows. All Rights Reserved.